There are lots of articles and reviews on Microsoft's recently launched Surface and Tablet devices so it is hard to have a "new" viewpoint. However, here is my initial reaction to MS Surface model I have been playing with:
Bottomline Yes, Microsoft Surface can be "the official" (Corporate IT) alternative to BYOD and will get the job done nicely!
Other Links:
- Sweet spot: A neat tablet for office workers. Familiar Windows look-and-feel retained in the “desktop” mode. Caveat: will require user-training re-learning (pinch, toggle apps etc) to run apps in the metro/tablet mode
- Should have a seamless windows experience once we dock and use a bigger screen, mouse and regular keyboard
- Assuming windows authentication, security, single-signon etc apply, easy to enforce current IS management policies
- Big plus: comes with USB port: for users to transfer data and files without the need to be on the cloud/network. I could easily connect a mouse, keyboard etc to the Surface and work in a desktop mode.
- Corporations are already moving user/business applications to VDI mode. This will make other alternatives (iPADs) equally attractive in the workplace
- Cool factor: If MS/Market positions Surface as a tablet for “grown ups.” Road-warriors may be hesitant to bring it to sales/client meetings on the road, a fate BB is suffering (ref: recent #NYT article - The BlackBerry as Black Sheep and my blog post on the topic)
- Practical challenge: Cold boot time is over 45 seconds. iPad and Android tablets take much less time to boot up. Not cool.
- Backward compatibility: ARM version running Windows RT is not backward compatible. Users will be unable to install oder Windows apps. Cost benefit of x86-powered device will have to be factored in
Bottomline Yes, Microsoft Surface can be "the official" (Corporate IT) alternative to BYOD and will get the job done nicely!
Other Links:
No comments:
Post a Comment